Case 3315387/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mr M Buckley 3315387/2020 Mr A Warsama 3315388/2020; 3315399/2020 Mr G Williams 3315389/2020; 3315400/2020 v Car Giant Ltd R1 Mr Chico Obhari R2 — 2023
- Case reference
- 3315387/2020
- Decision date
- 9 August 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Quill
- Venue
- Watford
- Panel members
- Ms K Charman, Mr D Wharton
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr M Buckley 3315387/2020 Mr A Warsama 3315388/2020; 3315399/2020 Mr G Williams 3315389/2020; 3315400/2020
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal at Watford, sitting with Employment Judge Quill and lay members Ms K Charman and Mr D Wharton, heard the claims on 31 July, 1 to 4 August and 7 to 9 August 2023. In the judgment sent to the parties on 15 September 2023, it recorded that the complaints before it included unfair dismissal, harassment related to race, and direct race discrimination, brought by the claimants against both respondents.
By unanimous decision, the tribunal dismissed the unfair dismissal complaints as not well-founded. It also dismissed the complaints of harassment related to race and the complaints of direct discrimination because of race, each of which failed against each respondent. The extract supplied records the tribunal's dispositive conclusions and does not set out any separate monetary remedy or award.
The claimants had requested written reasons, which the tribunal said would be produced and sent to the parties. No remedy was recorded in the judgment extract, and no additional findings beyond the dismissals are set out in the text provided.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | By a unanimous decision, the complaint of unfair dismissal by each claimant was not well-founded and dismissed. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Harassment | By a unanimous decision, the complaints by each claimant against each respondent of harassment related to race failed and were dismissed. | Dismissed | Race | — |
| Race discrimination | By a unanimous decision, the complaints by each claimant against each respondent of direct discrimination because of race failed and were dismissed. | Dismissed | Race | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.