Case 3315879/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs B MIodziejewska v Orchard House Foods Limited (in administration) — 2020
- Case reference
- 3315879/2019
- Decision date
- 3 December 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Ord Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs B MIodziejewska
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningBy letter dated 25 August 2020, the tribunal told the claimant that the claim might be struck out because she had not complied with the order dated 19 May 2020 and because the claim had not been actively pursued. The claimant was given an opportunity to make written representations or request a hearing on why strike out should not follow.
The claimant did not make representations, or did not make any sufficient representations, and did not request a hearing. On that basis, Employment Judge Ord ordered that the claim be struck out under rule 37. No substantive determination of the underlying employment claims or any monetary remedy is recorded in this judgment.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The tribunal struck out the claim under rule 37 after a letter dated 25/8/2020 gave the claimant an opportunity to make representations or request a hearing. The stated reasons were non-compliance with the tribunal's order dated 19/5/2020 and that the claim had not been actively pursued. The claimant did not make sufficient representations or request a hearing. | Struck out | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- rule 37
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.