Case 3316533/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Ms A Dannreuther, counsel For the v Respondent — 2022
- Case reference
- 3316533/2021
- Decision date
- 29 November 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge George Appearances
- Venue
- Watford
Parties
1 namedClaimant
Ms A Dannreuther, counsel For the
Respondent
- —
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal dismissed the claims of automatic unfair dismissal contrary to s.103A Employment Rights Act 1996 and unlawful detriment contrary to s.47B Employment Rights Act 1996 because it did not have jurisdiction to consider them. The written record does not set out any merits findings on those claims.
It also recorded that the claims of direct disability discrimination under s.13 Equality Act 2010 and disability-related harassment under s.26 Equality Act 2010 were not presented within three months of the acts complained of. However, the tribunal decided it was just and equitable to extend time for presentation of those claims to 9 September 2021.
The judgment was given orally at the hearing, and the written record notes that written reasons would not be provided unless requested. No monetary award is recorded in the decision.
Claims and outcomes
4 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Whistleblowing | Claim under s.103A Employment Rights Act 1996 dismissed because the Employment Tribunal did not have jurisdiction to consider it. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Whistleblowing | Claim of unlawful detriment under s.47B Employment Rights Act 1996 dismissed because the Employment Tribunal did not have jurisdiction to consider it. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Disability discrimination | Direct disability discrimination claim under s.13 Equality Act 2010 was presented outside the three-month time limit, but the tribunal held it was just and equitable to extend time for presentation to 9 September 2021. No merits decision is recorded in the written judgment. | Other | Disability | — |
| Harassment | Disability-related harassment claim under s.26 Equality Act 2010 was presented outside the three-month time limit, but the tribunal held it was just and equitable to extend time for presentation to 9 September 2021. No merits decision is recorded in the written judgment. | Other | Disability | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- just and equitable extension of time
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.