Case 3318979/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Miss J Kitchener v Aramark Ltd — 2020
- Case reference
- 3318979/2019
- Decision date
- 29 January 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Ord Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss J Kitchener
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe Employment Tribunal struck out Miss J Kitchener's claim against Aramark Limited. In a letter dated 23 November 2019, the Tribunal invited the claimant to make representations or request a hearing as to why the claim should not be struck out because she had not complied with the Tribunal's order dated 2 July 2019 and because the claim had not been actively pursued.
The claimant did not make written representations, or did not make any sufficient representations, and did not request a hearing. The Tribunal therefore struck out the claim under rule 37.
The hearing listed for 29 January 2020 was vacated and did not take place. No remedy was awarded.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The judgment does not identify the underlying substantive claim type; it states only that 'the claim is struck out' under rule 37 because of non-compliance with the Tribunal's order dated 2 July 2019 and because the claim had not been actively pursued. | Struck out | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.