Miss K Jankulskaite v Iforce Limited — 2019

Case reference: 3319020/2019
Decision date: 7 November 2019
Jurisdiction: England & Wales
Judge: Employment Judge The Claimant’s

Indexed: 21 May 2026

Parties

2 named

Claimant

Miss K Jankulskaite

Respondent

Iforce Limited

Key findings

Tribunal's reasoning

This was a Rule 21 judgment given because the time for presenting a response had expired and no valid response had been presented in time. On the information before the Employment Judge, the claimant's complaints that she was the victim of unlawful discrimination on the grounds of sex and that she suffered unlawful deductions from wages both succeeded.

The judgment did not determine remedy. It stated that the remedy to which the claimant was entitled would be determined at the hearing listed for 22 November 2019.

Claims and outcomes

2 findings recorded

Claim type	Issue or finding	Outcome	Protected characteristic	Award
Sex discrimination	Judgment under Rule 21 recorded that the claimant's complaint that she was the victim of unlawful discrimination on the grounds of sex succeeded.	Upheld	Sex	—
Unlawful deduction from wages	Judgment under Rule 21 recorded that the claimant's complaint of unlawful deductions from wages succeeded.	Upheld	—	—

Legal tests applied

1 reference

Official outcome judgment PDF

Gov.uk primary record

The official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.

Open official judgment PDF on gov.uk

Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.

How we got this data

Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.

Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.