Case 3319437/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs L Davies First v HBD Europe Limited Second Respondent: SK Clinic & Spas Limited — 2021
- Case reference
- 3319437/2019
- Decision date
- 21 February 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge M Warren Representation
- Venue
- Bury St Edmunds
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs L Davies First
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claimant, Mrs L Davies, appeared in person and the respondents did not attend the hearing. Employment Judge M Warren sat alone at Bury St Edmunds on 21 February 2021. The tribunal allowed the claim for unauthorised deduction from wages.
The judgment records that the amount awarded was calculated as one month's notice pay of £1,365 less £930 received from the insolvency service, together with £60 training expenses and a bonus payment of £168.75. The resulting gross sum ordered was £663.75, payable without deduction and taxable in the hands of the claimant.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal held that the respondent had made an unauthorised deduction from wages and ordered payment of the gross sum of £663.75. The judgment states that this comprised one month's notice pay of £1,365 less £930 received from the insolvency service, plus £60 training expenses and a £168.75 bonus payment. | Upheld | — | £664 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £664
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.