Case 3319441/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Miss K Orlopp First v HBD Europe Limited Second Respondent: SK Clinic & Spas Limited — 2020
- Case reference
- 3319441/2019
- Decision date
- 5 February 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge M Warren Representation
- Venue
- Bury St Edmunds
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss K Orlopp First
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe judgment is a short strike-out decision. It records that Miss K Orlopp did not reply to the tribunal's letter of 5 February 2020 and did not attend the hearing. The respondents also did not attend.
On that basis, Employment Judge M Warren struck out the claimant's claims because they were not being actively pursued. The extracted text does not set out the substantive allegations or any merits findings, and it does not record any remedy assessment.
The public judgment page is dated 11 March 2020 as the date sent to the parties, and the signature line records 24/02/2020. No lay members are listed, and the decision appears to have been made by a judge alone.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The extracted judgment text does not specify the underlying cause(s) of action. It records that the claimant failed to reply to the tribunal's letter of 5 February 2020 and failed to attend the hearing, so her claims were struck out as not being actively pursued. | Struck out | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.