Case 3319520/2019 · Employment Tribunal

Ms Z Alison v Asda Stores Limited — 2020

Case reference: 3319520/2019
Decision date: 8 October 2020
Jurisdiction: England & Wales
Judge: Employment Judge Daniels

Indexed: 19 May 2026

Parties

2 named

Claimant

Ms Z Alison

Respondent

Asda Stores Limited

Key findings

Tribunal's reasoning

At a preliminary hearing heard by telephone at Watford, the claimant withdrew her breach of contract claim. The tribunal dismissed that claim upon withdrawal.

The claimant also applied to amend her claim to include disability discrimination and/or age discrimination. Employment Judge Daniels found the amendment application was not well founded and dismissed it in its entirety.

The judgment records that no other claims were being pursued, so the proceedings were at an end.

Claims and outcomes

3 findings recorded

Claim type	Issue or finding	Outcome	Protected characteristic	Award
Breach of contract	The claim for breach of contract was dismissed upon withdrawal by the claimant at the preliminary hearing.	Withdrawn	—	—
Disability discrimination	The claimant's application to amend her claim to include disability discrimination was dismissed; the judgment does not determine a substantive disability discrimination claim.	Dismissed	Disability	—
Age discrimination	The claimant's application to amend her claim to include age discrimination was dismissed; the judgment does not determine a substantive age discrimination claim.	Dismissed	Age	—

Official outcome judgment PDF

Gov.uk primary record

The official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.

Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.

How we got this data

Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.

Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.