Case 3320071/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Ms J Eniola v Dacorum Borough Council — 2020
- Case reference
- 3320071/2019
- Decision date
- 6 March 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge R Lewis Dated
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms J Eniola
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe judgment records that the proceedings in case 3320071/2019 were dismissed because the claimant withdrew the claim. No substantive findings of fact or law are set out in the extracted text, and there is no merits determination recorded.
The available text identifies the Employment Judge as R Lewis and the decision date as 6 March 2020, with the judgment sent to the parties on 26 March 2020. No panel members are listed in the extracted text.
Because the judgment contains only the withdrawal dismissal, there is no remedy, liability finding, or legal test recorded in the supplied text.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Disability discrimination | The judgment states that the proceedings were dismissed following a withdrawal of the claim by the claimant. The extracted text does not identify the underlying pleaded allegations beyond the case listing context. | Withdrawn | Disability | — |
| Flexible working | The judgment states that the proceedings were dismissed following a withdrawal of the claim by the claimant. The extracted text does not set out a separate merits determination. | Withdrawn | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.