Case 3320638/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Ms M Badruu v Amey plc — 2022
- Case reference
- 3320638/2021
- Decision date
- 3 September 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Quill
- Venue
- Watford
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms M Badruu
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe judgment records that the case was heard at Watford Employment Tribunal by video on 29 July 2022 before Employment Judge Quill sitting alone. The claimant appeared in person and via Ms Hafeed, her daughter, and the respondent was represented by Mr W Haines, consultant.
The operative judgment states: "All of the claims are struck out." The written record does not give separate reasons, identify each claim in the body of the judgment, or record any remedy. It notes that reasons were given orally at the hearing and that written reasons would not be provided unless requested within 14 days of the written record being sent to the parties.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The short judgment states that all claims are struck out but does not separately identify the claim types; this classification follows the supplied gov.uk listing category hint. | Struck out | — | — |
| Religion or belief discrimination | The short judgment states that all claims are struck out but does not separately identify the claim types; this classification follows the supplied gov.uk listing category hint. | Struck out | Religion or belief | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.