Case 3320688/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Mr E Kapllani v BFS Group Limited — 2023
- Case reference
- 3320688/2021
- Decision date
- 25 March 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Gumbiti-Zimuto Appearances
- Venue
- Reading
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr E Kapllani
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal sat at Reading on 1 March 2023 before Employment Judge Gumbiti-Zimuto. The claimant, Mr E Kapllani, appeared in person with the assistance of an Albanian interpreter, and the respondent, BFS Group Limited, was represented by counsel. The written record does not set out detailed reasons or findings of fact.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | The written record states only that the claimant's complaints were not well founded and were dismissed. The specific claim categories are taken from the case listing context; no separate reasoning is provided in the extracted judgment text. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The written record states only that the claimant's complaints were not well founded and were dismissed. The specific claim categories are taken from the case listing context; no separate reasoning is provided in the extracted judgment text. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.