Case 3320799/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs T Chaplin v Oakview Health Limited Upon the parties having agreed terms of settlement and by consent — 2020
- Case reference
- 3320799/2019
- Decision date
- 29 September 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge M Warren Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs T Chaplin
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningOn 29 September 2020, Employment Judge M Warren recorded that the parties had agreed terms of settlement and entered judgment by consent. The judgment states that Mrs T Chaplin was dismissed in breach of contract in respect of notice, and the respondent was ordered to pay damages of £656.80.
The judgment also records that Mrs Chaplin was dismissed by reason of redundancy and was entitled to a redundancy payment of £985.20. Her claims for unfair dismissal, unpaid wages and holiday pay were dismissed upon withdrawal. The hearing listed for 8 October 2020 was cancelled.
Claims and outcomes
5 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | Dismissal in breach of contract in respect of notice; damages ordered by consent. | Upheld | — | £657 |
| Redundancy | Recorded as dismissed by reason of redundancy; redundancy payment ordered by consent. | Upheld | — | £985 |
| Unfair dismissal | Dismissed upon withdrawal. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Unpaid wages claim dismissed upon withdrawal. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Holiday pay | Dismissed upon withdrawal. | Withdrawn | — | — |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £1,642
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.