Case 3320800/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mr T Branham v Oakview Health Limited Upon the parties having agreed terms of settlement and by consent — 2020
- Case reference
- 3320800/2019
- Decision date
- 29 September 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge M Warren Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr T Branham
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe parties agreed terms of settlement, and judgment was entered by consent. The tribunal recorded that the claimant, Mr T Branham, had been dismissed in breach of contract in respect of notice. The respondent, Oakview Health Limited, was ordered to pay damages of £1,336.52 for that claim.
The tribunal also recorded that the claimant was dismissed by reason of redundancy and was entitled to a redundancy payment of £2,004.78. The other claims listed in the judgment, unfair dismissal, unpaid wages, and holiday pay, were dismissed upon withdrawal.
The hearing listed for 8 October 2020 was cancelled. No separate findings on unfair dismissal, wages, or holiday pay were recorded beyond the withdrawals, and no legal tests were set out in the short judgment.
Claims and outcomes
5 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | The judgment states the claimant was dismissed in breach of contract in respect of notice, and the respondent was ordered to pay damages of £1,336.52. | Upheld | — | £1,337 |
| Redundancy | The judgment states the claimant was dismissed by reason of redundancy and was entitled to a redundancy payment of £2,004.78. | Upheld | — | £2,005 |
| Unfair dismissal | The judgment says the unfair dismissal claim was dismissed upon withdrawal. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The judgment says the unpaid wages claim was dismissed upon withdrawal. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Holiday pay | The judgment says the holiday pay claim was dismissed upon withdrawal. | Withdrawn | — | — |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £3,341
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.