Case 3320824/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Ms H Walton v B&Q Limited and 1 other — 2020
- Case reference
- 3320824/2019
- Decision date
- 4 December 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge KJ Palmer
- Venue
- Norwich
Parties
3 namedClaimant
Ms H Walton
Respondents
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe preliminary hearing determined whether the claimant was a disabled person for the purposes of s.6 Equality Act 2010. The claimant relied on a physical impairment arising from a shattered talus bone, with 13 April 2019 identified as the material date for assessing disability.
The tribunal found that the claimant had suffered a significant injury in July 2016 and had been severely incapacitated for a time, but held that the evidence did not establish disability at the material date. The tribunal considered the medical evidence and impact statement inadequate, noting that the medical report was based on an earlier consultation and did not provide meaningful evidence about the claimant's condition at the relevant time.
Applying the s.6 test and the Goodwin questions, the tribunal was not satisfied that the claimant had a relevant impairment at the material time, or that any impairment had a substantial adverse effect on normal day-to-day activities. It also found insufficient evidence that any adverse effect was long term. Because both pleaded claims depended on the claimant being disabled, the claims were dismissed and the listed full merits hearing was to be vacated.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Disability discrimination | Claim for discrimination arising from disability under s.15 Equality Act 2010 was dismissed because the tribunal found the claimant was not a disabled person for the purposes of s.6 Equality Act 2010 at the material time. | Dismissed | Disability | — |
| Harassment | Claim for harassment based on the protected characteristic of disability under s.26 Equality Act 2010 was dismissed because it depended on the claimant being disabled under s.6 Equality Act 2010. | Dismissed | Disability | — |
Legal tests applied
8 references- s.6 Equality Act 2010
- s.15 Equality Act 2010
- s.26 Equality Act 2010
- Equality Act 2010 Disability Regulations 2010
- Guidance on matters to be taken into account in determining questions relating to the definition of disability 2010
- Goodwin v Patent Office 1999 ICR 302
- J v DLA Piper UK LLP 2010 ICR 1052
- Khorochilova v Euro Rep Limited 0266/19
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.