Case 3320887/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs L Wiggan v Primark Stores Limited and 4 others — 2023
- Case reference
- 3320887/2021
- Decision date
- 3 July 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Quill Date
Parties
6 namedClaimant
Mrs L Wiggan
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe Claimant's application for reconsideration of the judgment sent to the parties on 3 July 2023 was granted. The reconsideration corrected the party names for that judgment, listing Primark Stores Ltd and the named individual respondents.
The tribunal stated that the correction did not affect the earlier decision that the Claimant's email of 12 October 2022 brought the claim to an end on that date because it withdrew the entire claim and Rule 51 applied. The tribunal also maintained the decision declining to issue a judgment dismissing the claim.
Claims and outcomes
5 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The judgment does not adjudicate the substantive unfair dismissal claim; it records that the Claimant's email of 12 October 2022 withdrew the entire claim and Rule 51 applies. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Breach of contract | The judgment does not adjudicate the substantive breach of contract claim; it records that the Claimant's email of 12 October 2022 withdrew the entire claim and Rule 51 applies. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Disability discrimination | The judgment does not adjudicate the substantive disability discrimination claim; it records that the Claimant's email of 12 October 2022 withdrew the entire claim and Rule 51 applies. | Withdrawn | Disability | — |
| Race discrimination | The judgment does not adjudicate the substantive race discrimination claim; it records that the Claimant's email of 12 October 2022 withdrew the entire claim and Rule 51 applies. | Withdrawn | Race | — |
| Other | The gov.uk category includes Right To Be Accompanied, but the judgment itself does not itemise that claim; it records that the entire claim was withdrawn. | Withdrawn | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Rule 51
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.