Case 3321193/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs B Healy v Co-op — 2020
- Case reference
- 3321193/2019
- Decision date
- 8 April 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge R Lewis Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs B Healy
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningBy letter dated 22 January 2020, the Tribunal gave Mrs B Healy an opportunity to make written representations or request a hearing as to why the claim should not be struck out. The stated grounds were that the claimant had not complied with the Tribunal's letter of 30 November 2019 and that the claim had not been actively pursued.
Mrs Healy did not make representations in writing, or did not make any sufficient representations, and did not request a hearing. The Tribunal therefore struck out the claim under rule 37.
The hearing listed for 8 April 2020 did not take place. The judgment records no determination of the underlying merits and no monetary award.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The claim was struck out under rule 37 after the claimant did not make written representations, make sufficient representations, or request a hearing in response to the Tribunal's letter of 22 January 2020. The strike out was based on non-compliance with the Tribunal's 30 November 2019 letter and the claim not being actively pursued. | Struck out | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- rule 37
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.