Case 3321585/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mr M Ibe v John Lewis plc — 2022
- Case reference
- 3321585/2019
- Decision date
- 5 July 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Hawksworth Appearances
- Venue
- Reading
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr M Ibe
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a costs judgment following a hearing by telephone at Reading on 4 July 2022 before Employment Judge Hawksworth. The claimant appeared in person and the respondent was represented by counsel.
The tribunal ordered the claimant to pay £750 as a contribution to the respondent's costs incurred in respect of the postponement of the full merits hearing on 4 July 2022. The written judgment records that reasons were given orally and that written reasons would only be provided if requested within the specified time.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | Costs judgment only: the claimant was ordered to pay £750 as a contribution to the respondent's costs incurred in respect of postponement of the full merits hearing on 4 July 2022. The merits claims were not adjudicated in this judgment. | Upheld | — | £750 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £750
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
- Open official judgment 1 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 2 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 3 PDF on gov.uk
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.