Case 3321955/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mr R Lavell v Elior UK plc — 2021
- Case reference
- 3321955/2019
- Decision date
- 16 March 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Postle
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr R Lavell
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal struck out the claim after giving the claimant an opportunity to make written representations under Rule 37(2). The judge considered the claimant's email of 26 October 2020 and the medical material provided, but found that the evidence did not explain why the claimant could not participate in the telephone preliminary hearing on 13 August 2020 or answer the tribunal's calls that day.
The judgment records that the proceedings had not progressed in any meaningful way since they were issued in August 2019. The claimant had not clarified the alleged discriminatory acts or the protected characteristics relied on, despite the claim involving multiple possible protected characteristics and wages-related claims, and had not engaged with the respondent's request for further particulars. The tribunal found that this left the respondent unable properly to understand and prepare for the case.
Applying the overriding objective, the judge weighed fairness to both parties and considered whether a further hearing should be listed. The tribunal concluded that the claimant had already been given a reasonable opportunity to make representations, had not provided sufficient justification for the lack of progress, and had not shown concrete steps that would now be taken to advance the case. The claim was therefore struck out.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The judgment struck out the claim as a whole under Rule 37 for failure to actively pursue it. Although the judgment refers to multiple alleged discrimination and wages-related claims, it does not clearly identify each substantive claim for separate extraction. | Struck out | — | — |
Legal tests applied
3 references- Rule 37(2) Employment Tribunal Rules of Procedure
- overriding objective under Rule 2
- Equal Treatment Bench Book
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.