Case 3322400/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Miss E Kosiada v Pizza Express (Restaurants) Limited — 2023
- Case reference
- 3322400/2021
- Decision date
- 13 February 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Feeney REPRESENTATION
- Venue
- Watford
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss E Kosiada
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMiss E Kosiada did not attend the hearing at Watford on 8 February 2023. The respondent, Pizza Express (Restaurants) Limited, was represented by Ms Liberty-Green, paralegal.
Employment Judge Feeney struck out the claimant's claims in claim number 3322400/21 for failure to comply with orders of the Employment Tribunal under Rule 37(1)(c) of the Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013, and under Rule 37(1)(d) on the basis that the claims were not being actively pursued.
The written judgment records the outcome only. It does not set out separate factual findings on the underlying unfair dismissal, disability discrimination, or working time matters, and it records no monetary award or remedy.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The judgment records that all claims in claim number 3322400/21 were struck out; the short written judgment does not set out separate reasoning for this claim type. | Struck out | — | — |
| Disability discrimination | The judgment records that all claims in claim number 3322400/21 were struck out; the short written judgment does not set out separate reasoning for this claim type. | Struck out | Disability | — |
| Working time regulations | The judgment records that all claims in claim number 3322400/21 were struck out; the short written judgment does not set out separate reasoning for this claim type. | Struck out | — | — |
Legal tests applied
2 references- Rule 37(1)(c) of the Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013
- Rule 37(1)(d) of the Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.