Case 3323059/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Pyrcy Morson (Solicitor) For the v Morag Dalziel (Solicitor) — 2023
- Case reference
- 3323059/2021
- Decision date
- 9 March 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge J Lewis KC
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Pyrcy Morson (Solicitor) For the
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claimant worked for Whitbread Group Plc from 20 January 2017 until his resignation with effect from 19 July 2021. He brought an unfair dismissal claim and Equality Act claims said to arise from the handling of his route to Head Chef, his apprenticeship, and related grievance correspondence. The tribunal dealt only with time limits and did not determine the substantive merits of the claims.
For unfair dismissal, the tribunal applied section 111(2) ERA 1996 and found that it was reasonably practicable to present the claim in time. The claim form was presented on 9 November 2021, and the judge found no satisfactory explanation for leaving filing to the last day, relying on postal submission without checking whether the claim had been received or taking further steps when it had not been confirmed. The unfair dismissal claim was therefore dismissed as out of time.
For the Equality Act claims, the tribunal accepted that the claim was three days late beyond the 6 November 2021 deadline and applied the section 123(1) Equality Act 2010 just and equitable test, referring to Adedeji v University Hospitals Birmingham and Abertawe Bro Morgannwg University Local Health Board v Morgan. The judge accepted the delay was short and that the claimant had relied on solicitors, but held that the explanation was incomplete, that there was potential prejudice from issues going back to 2019 and the apprenticeship period, and that key witnesses had left the respondent's employment. The judge said the limited material did not permit a clear view on merits strong enough to outweigh those factors, and the discrimination, harassment and victimisation claims were dismissed as out of time.
Claims and outcomes
4 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | Dismissed as out of time after the tribunal found it was reasonably practicable to present the claim within the primary time limit. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Race discrimination | The judgment refers to the Equality Act case generally as discrimination, victimisation and harassment being out of time; extracted as race discrimination because the listing identified race discrimination and the pleaded protected act was a race discrimination grievance. | Dismissed | Race | — |
| Harassment | Dismissed as out of time with the other Equality Act claims under the just and equitable extension test. | Dismissed | Race | — |
| Victimisation | Dismissed as out of time with the other Equality Act claims under the just and equitable extension test. | Dismissed | Race | — |
Legal tests applied
4 references- s.111(2) ERA 1996 reasonably practicable
- s.123(1) Equality Act 2010 just and equitable extension
- Adedeji v University Hospitals Birmingham [2021] EWCA Civ 23
- Abertawe Bro Morgannwg University Local Health Board v Morgan [2018] ICS 1194 (CA)
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.