Case 3323264/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs S Williams v Asda Stores Limited — 2024
- Case reference
- 3323264/2021
- Decision date
- 31 January 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Bansal
- Venue
- Watford
- Panel members
- Mr D Wharton, Mr W Dykes
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs S Williams
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal heard the claim at Watford on 17-19 October 2023, with further consideration in chambers on 3 November 2023 and 12 January 2024. The panel was Employment Judge Bansal with members Mr D Wharton and Mr W Dykes.
The unanimous judgment was that Mrs Williams' claims for unfair dismissal, discrimination arising from disability, and failure to make reasonable adjustments were not well founded. All of those claims were dismissed.
The judgment records that reasons were given orally at the hearing. No written reasons are included in the supplied judgment unless requested under the tribunal rules.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The judgment states that the unfair dismissal claim was not well founded and was dismissed. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Disability discrimination | The judgment states that the claim for discrimination arising from disability was not well founded and was dismissed. | Dismissed | Disability | — |
| Disability discrimination | The judgment states that the claim for failure to make reasonable adjustments was not well founded and was dismissed. | Dismissed | Disability | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.