Case 3323283/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Mr K Delaney v Civil Nuclear Police Authority — 2023
- Case reference
- 3323283/2021
- Decision date
- 20 December 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Shastri-Hurst
- Venue
- Reading
- Panel members
- Mr G Edwards, Ms J Cameron
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr K Delaney
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claimant, Mr K Delaney, brought claims against the Civil Nuclear Police Authority for discrimination arising from disability and failure to make reasonable adjustments. The tribunal, sitting at Reading on 24 to 27 October 2023 before Employment Judge Shastri-Hurst with Mr G Edwards and Ms J Cameron, rejected both claims.
In its written judgment, the tribunal stated that the discrimination arising from disability claim was not well-founded and failed, and that the reasonable adjustments claim was also not well-founded and failed. No remedy was awarded, and the judgment records no separate compensation figures or other monetary relief.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Disability discrimination | Claim for discrimination arising from disability; the tribunal held it was not well-founded and failed. | Dismissed | Disability | — |
| Disability discrimination | Claim for failure to make reasonable adjustments; the tribunal held it was not well-founded and failed. | Dismissed | Disability | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.