Case 3323540/2019 · Employment Tribunal
MR WASKOWYCY v Biffa Municipal Limited — 2021
- Case reference
- 3323540/2019
- Decision date
- 25 March 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Skehan
- Venue
- Watford
Parties
2 namedClaimant
MR WASKOWYCY
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningEmployment Judge Skehan sat alone at Watford in a remote hearing on 11 March 2021. The tribunal recorded that it was not reasonably practicable for the complaint to be presented before the end of the primary limitation period under section 111 of the Employment Rights Act 1996, and that the complaint presented on 24 September 2019 was within such further period as the tribunal considered reasonable.
Despite that limitation finding, the claimant's constructive unfair dismissal claim was struck out under Rule 37 of the Employment Tribunal Rules because it had no reasonable prospect of success. The judgment does not set out any substantive merits reasoning beyond that strike-out basis. Written reasons were not provided in the record because reasons had been given orally at the hearing and no request for written reasons was made within the stated period.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Constructive dismissal | The tribunal struck out the claimant's constructive unfair dismissal claim under Rule 37 on the basis that it had no reasonable prospect of success. | Struck out | — | — |
Legal tests applied
2 references- s.111 Employment Rights Act 1996
- Rule 37 Employment Tribunal Rules
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.