Case 3323546/2021 · Employment Tribunal

Mr Singh (In person) For the v Mr Powis (solicitor) — 2024

Case reference: 3323546/2021
Decision date: 3 May 2024
Jurisdiction: England & Wales
Judge: Employment Judge Cowen Appearances
Venue: Watford Tribunal

Indexed: 18 May 2026

Parties

2 named

Claimant

Mr Singh (In person) For the

Respondent

Mr Powis (solicitor)

Key findings

Tribunal's reasoning

The claimant brought claims against Wasabi Co Limited including constructive unfair dismissal, protected disclosure detriment, automatic unfair dismissal due to a protected disclosure, harassment related to disability, direct disability discrimination, and failure to make reasonable adjustments.

The written judgment states that, for the reasons given orally at the hearing, all listed claims were not well-founded and were dismissed. The written record does not set out factual findings, legal analysis, remedy figures, or any award.

Claims and outcomes

6 findings recorded

Claim type	Issue or finding	Outcome	Protected characteristic	Award
Constructive dismissal	The judgment records the claim as Constructive Unfair Dismissal and states it was not well-founded and dismissed. Reasons were given orally; no written reasons are included in the text.	Dismissed	—	—
Whistleblowing	The judgment records a claim of detriment due to protected disclosure and states it was not well-founded and dismissed. Reasons were given orally; no written reasons are included in the text.	Dismissed	—	—
Unfair dismissal	The judgment records a claim of automatic unfair dismissal due to a protected disclosure and states it was not well-founded and dismissed. Reasons were given orally; no written reasons are included in the text.	Dismissed	—	—
Harassment	The judgment records harassment related to disability and states it was not well-founded and dismissed. Reasons were given orally; no written reasons are included in the text.	Dismissed	Disability	—
Disability discrimination	The judgment records direct disability discrimination and states it was not well-founded and dismissed. Reasons were given orally; no written reasons are included in the text.	Dismissed	Disability	—
Disability discrimination	The judgment records failure to make reasonable adjustments and states it was not well-founded and dismissed. Reasons were given orally; no written reasons are included in the text.

Official outcome judgment PDF

Gov.uk primary record

The official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.

Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.

How we got this data

Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.

Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.