Case 3325174/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs P Lewis v Cambridgeshire County Council — 2020
- Case reference
- 3325174/2019
- Decision date
- 11 September 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Foxwell
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs P Lewis
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal made a strike out judgment in favour of the respondent, Cambridgeshire County Council. It recorded that the claimant, Mrs P Lewis, had been given an opportunity by letter dated 28 May 2021 to make representations or request a hearing on why the claim should not be struck out.
The reasons stated were that the claimant had not complied with the Tribunal's order of 11 September 2020 and that the claim had not been actively pursued. The judgment does not set out any substantive liability findings on the underlying dispute before striking out the claim.
No remedy was awarded. The judgment is limited to the strike out under rule 37 and does not record any compensation, basic award, or other monetary sum.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The tribunal struck out the claim under rule 37 after giving the claimant an opportunity, by letter dated 28/5/2021, to make representations or request a hearing as to why the claim should not be struck out for non-compliance with the Tribunal's order of 11/9/2020 and because it had not been actively pursued. | Struck out | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013, rule 37
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.