Case 3325738/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mr M Taylor v Allianz Management Services Limited — 2021
- Case reference
- 3325738/2019
- Decision date
- 3 June 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Anstis
- Panel members
- Ms D Ballard, Ms F Tankard
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr M Taylor
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe hearing took place at Reading by CVP on 1 to 3 June 2021 before Employment Judge Anstis, sitting with Ms D Ballard and Ms F Tankard. The claimant was Mr M Taylor and the respondent was Allianz Management Services Limited. The written judgment records that reasons were given orally at the hearing, so no written reasons were provided.
The only substantive dispositive orders recorded are that claim 3325738/2019 was dismissed on withdrawal and claim 2600135/2021 was dismissed. The short written judgment does not set out the underlying allegations, factual findings, or any remedy because no award was made.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recordedThis case has mixed outcomes under at least one legal claim type. A tribunal can uphold some allegations and dismiss others under the same legal head, so rows below may represent separate issues or allegation groups from the judgment.
| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | Claim 3325738/2019 was dismissed on withdrawal. The written judgment does not identify the underlying cause of action. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Other | Claim 2600135/2021 was dismissed. The written judgment does not identify the underlying cause of action. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.