Case 3325800/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mr N Brydon v Kier Group plc — 2020
- Case reference
- 3325800/2019
- Decision date
- 20 July 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Ord
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr N Brydon
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe judgment struck out the claimant's complaints of failure to pay holiday pay and unlawful discrimination on the grounds of sex and race.
The Tribunal had written to the claimant on 14 February 2020 giving an opportunity to make representations or request a hearing about why the complaints should not be struck out, because they appeared to have been presented out of time and the Tribunal did not appear to have jurisdiction to hear them. The claimant did not make written representations, did not make sufficient representations, and did not request a hearing, so the claims were struck out.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Holiday pay | The complaint of failure to pay holiday pay was struck out because it was presented out of time and the tribunal did not appear to have jurisdiction to hear it. | Struck out | — | — |
| Sex discrimination | The complaint of unlawful discrimination on the grounds of sex was struck out because it was presented out of time and the tribunal did not appear to have jurisdiction to hear it. | Struck out | Sex | — |
| Race discrimination | The complaint of unlawful discrimination on the grounds of race was struck out because it was presented out of time and the tribunal did not appear to have jurisdiction to hear it. | Struck out | Race | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- rule 37
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.