Case 3326262/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mr Paul Eastwood v Pizza Express (Restaurants) Limited — 2020
- Case reference
- 3326262/2019
- Decision date
- 13 November 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Bedeau Representation
- Venue
- Watford
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr Paul Eastwood
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claim before Employment Judge Bedeau was Mr Paul Eastwood's unfair dismissal claim against Pizza Express (Restaurants) Ltd. The hearing took place at Watford by Cloud Video Platform on 13 November 2020. The claimant did not attend and was not represented; the respondent was represented by Mr A Ahmed, solicitor.
The written judgment records the outcome only: the claimant's unfair dismissal claim was not well-founded and was dismissed. No monetary remedy was awarded or otherwise recorded. The judgment states that reasons were given orally at the hearing and that written reasons would not be provided unless requested under the stated procedure.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The written judgment records that the unfair dismissal claim was not well-founded and was dismissed; oral reasons are not included in the written record. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.