Case 3330720/2018 · Employment Tribunal
Miss D Lawrence v Barnet, Enfield and Haringey Mental Health NHS Trust — 2021
- Case reference
- 3330720/2018
- Decision date
- 16 August 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge George
- Panel members
- Mr Steven Woodward, Mrs Jessica McGregor
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss D Lawrence
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningFollowing the liability judgment sent on 16 August 2021, the tribunal heard remedy evidence on 24 September 2021 and, in chambers, on 30 September 2021. The parties agreed the basic award figure and the respondent accepted the weekly net loss figure of £448.53. The remaining issues were Polkey, mitigation, pension loss, and loss of statutory rights.
The tribunal held that the Polkey question had already been decided at liability stage, so the claimant was subject to a 75% reduction from the date of dismissal rather than a period of full salary before any deduction. On mitigation, the majority found that she had not taken reasonable steps because she did not actively use the NHS Jobs website and could have applied for more work; it accepted that she had used job websites, HeadsUp, and training to improve her skills, and that her search was affected by the pandemic and by not having a laptop, but Mr Woodward dissented in part on that issue.
On pension loss, the tribunal accepted that, had she not been dismissed, the claimant would have reached 60 on 13 November 2018 and then taken her pension while continuing NHS work, and it assessed pension loss at £10,181.56 using the Pension Principles (4th Ed. 3rd rev.) rather than a contributions-only approach. It also awarded £500 for loss of statutory rights. The remedy table records a basic award calculation of £3,300.75 after a 25% conduct deduction, a prescribed element of £4,373.17 for the period 17 February 2018 to 16 February 2019, and a final award line of £7,043.56; the Employment Protection (Recoupment of Jobseeker's Allowance and Income Support) Regulations 1996 apply.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | By majority, with Mr Woodward dissenting in part. The remedy table separately records the basic award calculation and the compensatory section, with the final award line at £7,043.56. | Upheld | — | £7,044 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £7,044
- across all upheld claims
- Basic award
- £3,301
- statutory, unfair dismissal
- Compensatory award
- £7,044
- compensatory remedy recorded
Legal tests applied
6 references- Polkey v AE Dayton Services Ltd [1987] IRLR 503
- Gardiner-Hill v Roland Berger Technics Ltd [1982] IRLR 498
- Pension Principles (4th Ed. 3rd rev.)
- s.122(2) ERA
- s.123(6) ERA
- s.124A ERA
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
- Open official judgment 1 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 2 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 3 PDF on gov.uk
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.