Case 3331055/2018 · Employment Tribunal
Mr C Nyari v Bupa Care Homes (GL) Ltd — 2019
- Case reference
- 3331055/2018
- Decision date
- 1 August 2019
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Bedeau Dated
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr C Nyari
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe judgment records that Mr C Nyari brought proceedings against Bupa Care Homes (ANS) Ltd under case number 3331055/2018.
The tribunal did not determine the merits of the pleaded claims. Employment Judge Bedeau dismissed the proceedings following the claimant's withdrawal of the claim.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The judgment states that the proceedings were dismissed following withdrawal of the claim by the claimant. The specific individual claims were not itemised in the judgment text; classification follows the listing categories only where supported by case context. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Race discrimination | The judgment states that the proceedings were dismissed following withdrawal of the claim by the claimant. The judgment text does not set out particulars of the race discrimination claim. | Withdrawn | Race | — |
| Breach of contract | The judgment states that the proceedings were dismissed following withdrawal of the claim by the claimant. The judgment text does not set out particulars of the breach of contract claim. | Withdrawn | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.