Case 3331763/2018 · Employment Tribunal
Mr A Mukherjee v Barnet, Enfield and Haringey Mental Health NHS Trust — 2020
- Case reference
- 3331763/2018
- Decision date
- 30 August 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Smail Dated
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr A Mukherjee
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe judgment records that the proceedings in case 3331763/2018 were dismissed following withdrawal of the claim by Mr A Mukherjee. The short judgment does not set out the underlying facts, evidence, or any findings on the merits of the race discrimination or unfair dismissal complaints.
No remedy is recorded. The judgment does not identify any legal test, and it does not list any lay panel members. It is signed by Employment Judge Smail, dated 5 June 2020, and sent to the parties on 30 August 2020.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Race discrimination | The judgment states that the proceedings were dismissed following withdrawal of the claim by the claimant. The short judgment does not separately describe the complaint; the type is taken from the case listing category. | Withdrawn | Race | — |
| Unfair dismissal | The judgment states that the proceedings were dismissed following withdrawal of the claim by the claimant. The short judgment does not separately describe the complaint; the type is taken from the case listing category. | Withdrawn | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.