Case 3331849/2018 · Employment Tribunal
Miss R Ricciardi v Oliver’s Cleaning Contractors Limited — 2019
- Case reference
- 3331849/2018
- Decision date
- 22 November 2019
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Jack Appearances
- Venue
- Watford
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss R Ricciardi
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt the preliminary hearing in Watford on 4 November 2019, before Employment Judge Jack, the tribunal discussed the issues with Miss Ricciardi. She accepted that she had received notice monies on her dismissal and accepted, after discussion of s.6(1) Equality Act 2010, that she did not fall within the definition of disability.
The tribunal recorded in its case management summary that, because she had less than two years' service and was not disabled within the meaning of the Equality Act 2010, she did not have sufficient service to bring a claim for unfair dismissal. It also said that any harassment and bullying complaint fell outside the tribunal's jurisdiction if it was unrelated to disability.
In the judgment section, the tribunal dismissed on withdrawal the claim for notice monies, noting that the respondent had paid the claimant. It also dismissed on withdrawal the disability discrimination claim, because the claimant accepted that she was not disabled within s.6 of the Equality Act 2010, and dismissed on withdrawal the harassment and bullying claim, because it had no jurisdiction over that claim after the disability discrimination claim was dismissed. No monetary award was made.
Claims and outcomes
4 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | Case management summary only: the claimant had less than two years' service and, because she was not disabled within the meaning of the Equality Act 2010, the tribunal said she did not have sufficient service to bring a claim for unfair dismissal. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Breach of contract | Claim for notice monies; the tribunal recorded that the respondent had paid the claimant, and the claim was dismissed on withdrawal. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Disability discrimination | The claimant accepted that she did not fall within the definition of disability in s.6(1) of the Equality Act 2010, and the claim was dismissed on withdrawal. | Withdrawn | Disability | — |
| Harassment | Claim described as harassment and bullying; the tribunal said it had no jurisdiction over such a claim after the disability discrimination claim was dismissed. | Withdrawn | Disability | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- s.6(1) Equality Act 2010
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.