Case 3332180/2018 · Employment Tribunal
In person For the v Ms S Hobson, solicitor — 2018
- Case reference
- 3332180/2018
- Decision date
- 21 June 2018
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Johnson Appearances
- Venue
- Cambridge
Parties
2 namedClaimant
In person For the
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claimant, a Royal Mail postman, was dismissed for gross misconduct on 22 March 2018. He later brought claims under the Employment Rights Act 1996 concerning arrears of a negotiated pay rise, unpaid scheduled attendance payments, and holiday pay allegedly accrued during suspension. The tribunal dealt first with limitation and jurisdiction, because the claim was presented on 21 August 2018 after the three-month time limit had expired on 21 June 2018.
The tribunal accepted that the claimant had epilepsy, post-traumatic stress disorder, and other personal difficulties, but found no medical evidence or other evidence showing that those matters prevented him from presenting a claim in time. It also found that he had been represented by a CWU representative throughout the disciplinary process and appeal, and that any failure by that representative to warn him about tribunal time limits, or any mistaken advice about the deadline, did not make late presentation not reasonably practicable. Applying the statutory not reasonably practicable test, the tribunal held that the claims were out of time and dismissed them for lack of jurisdiction. No remedy was awarded.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Claim for arrears of a pay rise negotiated between the CWU and the Respondent in October 2017; dismissed because the tribunal held the claim was out of time and it had no jurisdiction to hear it. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Claim for unpaid scheduled attendance payments while medically suspended; dismissed because the tribunal held the claim was out of time and it had no jurisdiction to hear it. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Holiday pay | Claim for holiday pay said to have accrued during suspension from work; dismissed because the tribunal held the claim was out of time and it had no jurisdiction to hear it. | Dismissed | — | — |
Legal tests applied
10 references- not reasonably practicable test
- s.23(4) ERA 1996
- s.111(2) ERA 1996
- reasonable feasibility
- Porter v Bandridge Ltd
- Palmer and Saunders v Southend-on-Sea Borough Council
- Asda Stores Ltd v Kauser
- Schultz v Esso Petroleum
- Dedman v British Building and Engineering Appliances Ltd
- Walls Meat Company Ltd v Khan
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.