Mr A Mahmood v Centurylink Limited — 2019

Case reference: 3332243/2018
Decision date: 9 August 2019
Jurisdiction: England & Wales
Judge: Employment Judge Gumbiti-Zimuto Date

Indexed: 21 May 2026

Parties

2 named

Claimant

Mr A Mahmood

Respondent

Centurylink Limited

Key findings

Tribunal's reasoning

At the Preliminary Hearing on 1 March 2019, Mr A Mahmood withdrew his complaints of indirect race discrimination, harassment related to race, and victimisation against Centurylink Limited. The tribunal recorded that, following that withdrawal, the complaints were dismissed pursuant to rule 52 of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2019.

The judgment does not record any substantive findings on liability, evidence, or remedy. It is a procedural disposal only, and no monetary award is recorded in the judgment.

Claims and outcomes

3 findings recorded

Claim type	Issue or finding	Outcome	Protected characteristic	Award
Race discrimination	Indirect race discrimination complaint withdrawn by the claimant at the Preliminary Hearing on 1 March 2019; dismissed pursuant to rule 52.	Dismissed	Race	—
Harassment	Harassment related to race complaint withdrawn by the claimant at the Preliminary Hearing on 1 March 2019; dismissed pursuant to rule 52.	Dismissed	Race	—
Victimisation	Victimisation complaint withdrawn by the claimant at the Preliminary Hearing on 1 March 2019; dismissed pursuant to rule 52.	Dismissed	Race	—

Official outcome judgment PDF

Gov.uk primary record

The official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.

Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.

How we got this data

Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.

Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.