Case 3333036/2018 · Employment Tribunal
Mr J Woodward v Eddie Stobart Limited — 2019
- Case reference
- 3333036/2018
- Decision date
- 20 September 2019
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge R Lewis Dated
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr J Woodward
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe Employment Tribunal recorded that the proceedings in case 3333036/2018 were dismissed following withdrawal of the claim by Mr J Woodward. The judgment does not set out any substantive findings on liability or any determination of the underlying complaints.
The written record is limited to the dismissal, the signature of Employment Judge R Lewis, and the dates shown on the judgment: 25 July 2019, with the judgment sent to the parties on 20 September 2019. No financial award, costs order, or legal test is recorded in the text provided.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The judgment records that the proceedings were dismissed following withdrawal of the claim by the claimant. The underlying complaint type is taken from the case listing context, as the judgment text itself does not list individual complaints. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The judgment records that the proceedings were dismissed following withdrawal of the claim by the claimant. The underlying complaint type is taken from the case listing context, as the judgment text itself does not list individual complaints. | Withdrawn | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.