Case 3334564/2018 · Employment Tribunal
Mr R Lyons v The Chief Constable of Thames Valley Police PRELIMINARY HEARING — 2019
- Case reference
- 3334564/2018
- Decision date
- 4 October 2019
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Lang
- Venue
- Reading
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr R Lyons
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt the preliminary hearing in Reading on 3 October 2019 before Employment Judge Lang sitting alone, the tribunal recorded that the complaints of direct discrimination, indirect discrimination and harassment were dismissed following withdrawal by the claimant.
The judgment also states that the complaints of failure to make reasonable adjustments and discrimination arising from a disability continued, so those issues were not determined in this hearing. No monetary award is recorded in the judgment.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Disability discrimination | Direct discrimination complaint; the judgment states it was dismissed following withdrawal by the claimant. | Withdrawn | Disability | — |
| Disability discrimination | Indirect discrimination complaint; the judgment states it was dismissed following withdrawal by the claimant. | Withdrawn | Disability | — |
| Harassment | Harassment complaint; the judgment states it was dismissed following withdrawal by the claimant. | Withdrawn | Disability | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.