Case 3334811/2018 · Employment Tribunal
Mr Tekena Nemi v Asda Stores Limited — 2018
- Case reference
- 3334811/2018
- Decision date
- 24 September 2018
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Alliott
- Venue
- Watford
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr Tekena Nemi
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt an open preliminary hearing, the tribunal considered the respondent's application for strike out and/or a deposit order. Although the claim form only ticked unfair dismissal, it also referred to repudiatory breach of contract and failure to make reasonable adjustments, and the case had been coded as unfair dismissal, disability discrimination and breach of contract.
The tribunal struck out the disability discrimination claim. It found that the reduced-hours issue related to a period before February 2018, was well out of time, and that it would not be just and equitable to extend time. On the reasonable adjustments allegation about working in the checkout area, the tribunal found the claim had no reasonable prospect of success, noting that the claimant would need to establish a PCP causing substantial disadvantage or unfavourable treatment and that it was highly probable there was little or no relevant differentiation between the roles relied on.
The constructive unfair dismissal claim was allowed to proceed. The tribunal understood that claim to be based on breach of the implied term of mutual trust and confidence up to and including the mediation meeting on 24 September 2018, which was capable of being presented as a last straw. It held that the four days between the mediation and resignation could be argued to be too short to constitute affirmation, so it could not find that this head of claim had little reasonable prospect of success.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Disability discrimination | The claim for disability discrimination, including the alleged failure to make reasonable adjustments, was struck out at a preliminary hearing as having no reasonable prospect of success. The tribunal also found the earlier reduced-hours issue was out of time and that it would not be just and equitable to extend time. | Struck out | Disability | — |
| Constructive dismissal | The respondent's strike-out or deposit application did not succeed in relation to the constructive unfair dismissal claim. The tribunal held it could not find that this head of claim had little reasonable prospect of success, and it would proceed. | Other | — | — |
| Wrongful dismissal | The judge stated that the breach of contract claim was assumed to be a claim for wrongful dismissal and notice pay if appropriate, but no substantive outcome was determined in this judgment. | Other | — | — |
Legal tests applied
8 references- no reasonable prospect of success
- just and equitable
- PCP
- substantial disadvantage
- unfavourable treatment
- implied term of mutual trust and confidence
- last straw
- affirmation
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.