Case 3335084/2018 · Employment Tribunal
Mr A Tapera v Amazon UK Services Limited and 1 other — 2020
- Case reference
- 3335084/2018
- Decision date
- 20 March 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Postle
- Venue
- Bury St Edmunds
Parties
3 namedClaimant
Mr A Tapera
Respondents
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt the preliminary hearing, the Tribunal struck out the Claimant's claims against Amazon UK Services Limited on the basis that they had no reasonable prospect of success. The judgment does not give further reasons or identify the specific claims against the first Respondent in the extracted text.
The claims against ICTS (UK) Limited were not determined. The Tribunal made an Unless Order requiring the Claimant to provide further particulars of four race discrimination allegations, including identifying the provision, criterion or practice for indirect discrimination complaints and explaining the alleged less favourable treatment and connection to race for a direct discrimination complaint.
The Judge stated that the reason for the Unless Order was the Claimant's continued failure to advance his case clearly and precisely against the second Respondent so that it could properly respond. The order provided that, unless the required particulars were supplied by 28 February 2020, the complaints of race discrimination under the Equality Act 2010 would stand dismissed without further order, notice or preliminary hearing.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The judgment states that the Claimant's claims against the first Respondent were struck out as having no reasonable prospect of success, but it does not identify in this text the legal classification of those claims. | Struck out | — | — |
| Race discrimination | The race discrimination complaints against the second Respondent were not finally determined at this preliminary hearing. They remained to be determined subject to an Unless Order requiring further particulars by 28 February 2020. | Other | Race | — |
Legal tests applied
2 references- no reasonable prospect of success
- Rule 38 of the Employment Tribunal Rules of Procedure 2013
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.