Case 3335419/2018 · Employment Tribunal
Claimant v Excel Technical Resourcing Solutions Ltd — 2021
- Case reference
- 3335419/2018
- Decision date
- 18 November 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Hanning
- Panel members
- Ms E Davey, Mr A Scott
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Claimant
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal heard the case remotely at Watford from 18 to 22 October 2021 before Employment Judge Hanning sitting with Ms E Davey and Mr A Scott. The written judgment records that the claimant's harassment claim under the Equality Act 2010 was not well founded and was dismissed, and that the claimant's 'equal terms' claim under the Equality Act 2010 was also not well founded and dismissed. No remedy was awarded. The record also notes that reasons were given orally at the hearing and that written reasons would not be provided unless requested.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Harassment | The judgment does not specify the relevant protected characteristic in the extracted text. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Other | The judgment describes this as an 'equal terms' claim under the Equality Act 2010; 'other' is used because that wording does not map cleanly to a locked enum. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.