Case 4100076/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Member J McCullagh Tribunal Member J McCaig Mr D Hawksworth v Greencore Food To Go Limited — 2021
- Case reference
- 4100076/2020
- Decision date
- 20 May 2021
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge Cowen Tribunal
- Panel members
- J McCullagh, J McCaig
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Member J McCullagh Tribunal Member J McCaig Mr D Hawksworth
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claimant had originally advanced race and disability harassment claims, unfair dismissal, victimisation, and whistleblowing, but the disability allegation was withdrawn before the final hearing. The tribunal found that Patrick Murray repeatedly used race-related abuse towards the claimant, including calling him 'English prick'/'English bastard' and saying he would be on a bus back to England, and held that those comments were unwanted conduct related to the claimant's nationality and amounted to harassment under s.26 Equality Act 2010. Other allegations, including the HR email about prison and the 2 December 2019 court-case question, were not found to be race harassment.
The tribunal dismissed victimisation and the whistleblowing/protected disclosure claims. It accepted that bringing Equality Act proceedings was a protected act, but found no evidence that Mark Campbell knew the claimant had issued such a claim or dismissed him because of it. It also held that the claimant's 1 October 2019 email to DVSA was a general question about cracked windscreens, not a qualifying disclosure under s.43B ERA 1996, so there was no protected disclosure and no automatic unfair dismissal under s.103A.
On unfair dismissal, the respondent said the dismissal was for conduct because the claimant had worked for PS Ridgeway while off sick. Applying the Burchell approach and s.98(4) ERA 1996, the tribunal held that the investigation by Mr Pentland and the dismissal decision by Mr Campbell were not reasonable because they did not properly explore why the claimant had taken other work, did not investigate his complaints about Mr Murray, and did not consider further occupational health input or alternative deployment. The tribunal rejected Polkey reduction and contributory fault reduction, and awarded £12,000 for injury to feelings, a £906 basic award, and £400 for loss of statutory rights, making a total award of £13,306.
Claims and outcomes
4 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Harassment | Race harassment under s.26 Equality Act 2010 was upheld in part. The tribunal accepted allegations that Mr Murray called the claimant an 'English prick' or 'English bastard', said he would be on the bus back to England, said the claimant would have to go home if Scotland gained independence, repeated the 'English prick' remark after the DVSA windscreen issue, and later threatened to sue him after covert recording; allegations about the HR email on 11 October 2019 and the 2 December 2019 court-case question were not found to be race harassment. | Upheld | Race | £12,000 |
| Victimisation | The claimant had done a protected act by bringing Equality Act proceedings, but the tribunal was not satisfied that Mark Campbell knew of that claim or dismissed the claimant because of it. The dismissal was found to be for conduct relating to work for another company while on sick leave. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Whistleblowing | The 1 October 2019 email to DVSA was held to be a generic enquiry about cracked windscreens, not a qualifying disclosure under s.43B ERA 1996. As there was no protected disclosure, the s.103A automatic unfair dismissal claim failed. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Unfair dismissal | The respondent relied on conduct, namely the claimant working for another company while receiving sick pay, but the tribunal held the investigation and dismissal process were unreasonable. Mr Pentland and Mr Campbell did not properly investigate the claimant's explanation, his complaints about Mr Murray, the possibility of further occupational health input, or alternative deployment; no Polkey reduction or contributory fault deduction was made. The remedy for unfair dismissal comprised a basic award of £906 and £400 for loss of statutory rights, with no compensatory award because the claimant had obtained better paid work before termination. |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £13,306
- across all upheld claims
- Basic award
- £906
- statutory, unfair dismissal
- Compensatory award
- £0
- compensatory remedy recorded
Legal tests applied
10 references- s.26 Equality Act 2010
- s.27 Equality Act 2010
- s.43B ERA 1996
- s.103A ERA 1996
- s.98(4) ERA 1996
- Burchell test
- band of reasonable responses
- Polkey reduction
- Igen v Wong
- Vento guidelines
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.