Case 4100108/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Ms A Hunter v Representing herself Mr Hunter and 1 other — 2026
- Case reference
- 4100108/2024
- Decision date
- 5 August 2026
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge D Hoey
- Venue
- Glasgow and
Parties
3 namedClaimant
Ms A Hunter
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningBy consent, HBC Bar Limited, the second respondent, was ordered to pay Ms Hunter £1,479.64 in holiday pay within 14 days. The company may make any deductions for Income Tax and employee National Insurance contributions required by law, provided it remits them to HM Revenue and Customs and gives Ms Hunter written evidence.
The judgment also declared by consent that Mr Hunter, the first respondent, unlawfully discriminated against Ms Hunter by harassment related to sex. He was ordered to pay £26,395.36 for financial loss with £2,800.08 interest, and £20,000 for injury to feelings with £4,243.28 interest. The judgment states that the total payable by Mr Hunter is £53,438.72.
The remainder of the claim was dismissed. The consent judgment does not identify the claims covered by that dismissal and gives no factual findings or named legal tests behind the agreed outcomes.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Holiday pay | The payment was ordered by consent against the second respondent, subject to permitted deductions for Income Tax and employee National Insurance contributions. | Upheld | — | £1,480 |
| Harassment | The declaration and remedy against the first respondent were recorded by consent. | Upheld | Sex | £53,439 |
| Other | The judgment dismisses the remainder of the claim but does not identify its constituent claims. | Dismissed | — | — |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £54,918
- across all upheld claims
- Compensatory award
- £26,395
- compensatory remedy recorded
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.