Case 4100398/2016 · Employment Tribunal
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No: 4100398/2016 Mrs S Dryburgh v Fife Health Board — 2017
- Case reference
- 4100398/2016
- Decision date
- 21 March 2017
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge F. Jane Garvie
Parties
2 namedClaimant
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No: 4100398/2016 Mrs S Dryburgh
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal record states that Mrs S Dryburgh's claim against Fife Health Board was withdrawn by the claimant. On that basis, the tribunal dismissed the claim under Rule 52 of Schedule 1 to the Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013. The extracted judgment text does not record any findings on the merits of the claim or any monetary award.
The judgment is dated 20 March 2017 and was entered in the register and copied to the parties on 21 March 2017. No lay members are listed, and the extracted text contains no further narrative reasoning.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The extracted judgment text does not state the substantive legal head of claim; the GOV.UK listing identifies the case as unfair dismissal. The claim was withdrawn by the claimant and dismissed under Rule 52 of the Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013. | Withdrawn | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Rule 52 of the Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.