Case 4100997/2016 · Employment Tribunal
Claimant v Living Ambitions Limited — 2022
- Case reference
- 4100997/2016
- Decision date
- 25 July 2022
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge F Eccles
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Claimant
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningOn 29 April 2022, after the claimant's legal representative had withdrawn, the Tribunal wrote asking for an update on the claim. No reply was received. A reminder letter was sent on 1 June 2022, and again there was no response.
On 17 June 2022, the Tribunal gave the claimant an opportunity to provide written reasons by 1 July 2022, or to request a hearing, to explain why the claim should not be struck out. No reply was received. The Tribunal found that the claimant had failed to give an acceptable reason why judgment should not be made and struck out the claim under rule 37 on the ground that it had not been actively pursued.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Claim struck out under rule 37(1)(d) because it had not been actively pursued. The claimant did not respond to Tribunal letters dated 29 April 2022, 1 June 2022, or the further opportunity given on 17 June 2022 to provide reasons or request a hearing. | Struck out | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- rule 37(1)(d)
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.