Case 4101046/2014 · Employment Tribunal
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No: 100702/2011 & Others (see attached list) Mrs C Forde & others v North Ayrshire Council — 2019
- Case reference
- 4101046/2014
- Decision date
- 11 October 2019
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge Frances Eccles
Parties
2 namedClaimant
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No: 100702/2011 & Others (see attached list) Mrs C Forde & others
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe judgment records that Mrs C Forde and others brought claims against North Ayrshire Council as part of multiple proceedings listed in the attached schedule, including case 4101046/2014, Mrs Eleanor Rice v North Ayrshire Council.
The tribunal did not determine the merits of the claims. It stated that the claims had been withdrawn by the claimants and were therefore dismissed under Rule 52 of the Rules in Schedule 1 to the Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013.
No monetary remedy was awarded and no findings were made on liability or remedy.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Equal pay | The judgment states that the claims were withdrawn by the claimants and dismissed under Rule 52. The claim type is inferred from the listing category 'Equal Pay Act' and case context; the judgment itself does not set out substantive issues. | Dismissed | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Rule 52 of the Rules contained in Schedule 1 of the Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.