Case 4101220/2015 · Employment Tribunal
Number: 4101220/2015 Mr J Hayes v Saica Pack UK Limited — 2025
- Case reference
- 4101220/2015
- Decision date
- 29 July 2025
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge L Wiseman Case
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Number: 4101220/2015 Mr J Hayes
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe judgment in Mr J Hayes v Saica Pack UK Limited records that the claim was struck out under rule 38 of the Employment Tribunal Procedure Rules 2024 because it had not been actively pursued within the meaning of rule 38(1)(d). The tribunal did not determine the merits of any underlying claim.
On 11 November 2024, the tribunal gave the claimant an opportunity to provide written reasons by 25 November 2024 or to request a hearing to consider why the claim should not be struck out. The claimant did not give an acceptable reason and did not request a hearing, so the tribunal struck out the claim. No remedy was awarded.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The extracted judgment does not specify the substantive cause of action; it records only that the claim was struck out under rule 38(1)(d) of the Employment Tribunal Procedure Rules 2024 for not being actively pursued. | Struck out | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- rule 38(1)(d) of the Employment Tribunal Procedure Rules 2024
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.