Case 4101224/2015 · Employment Tribunal
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case Number: 4101224/2015 Mr J Laird v Saica Pack UK Limited — 2024
- Case reference
- 4101224/2015
- Decision date
- 5 December 2024
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
Parties
2 namedClaimant
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case Number: 4101224/2015 Mr J Laird
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe Employment Tribunal for Scotland struck out Mr J Laird's claim against Saica Pack UK Limited under rule 37 of the Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013. The tribunal held that the claim had not been actively pursued within rule 37(1)(d).
On 11 November 2024, the tribunal gave the claimant an opportunity to provide written reasons by 25 November 2024, or to request a hearing to consider why the claim should not be struck out. The claimant did not give an acceptable reason and did not request a hearing.
As a result, the tribunal struck out the claim. The judgment does not record any substantive findings on the merits of the underlying dispute and does not award any remedy.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The judgment does not identify the underlying substantive claim type; it states only that the claim was struck out under rule 37(1)(d) for not being actively pursued. | Struck out | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- rule 37(1)(d)
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.