Case 4101231/2015 · Employment Tribunal
Number: 4101231/2015 Mr J Rafferty v Saica Pack UK Limited — 2025
- Case reference
- 4101231/2015
- Decision date
- 1 September 2025
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge L Wiseman Case
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Number: 4101231/2015 Mr J Rafferty
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningOn 1 September 2025 Employment Judge L Wiseman struck out Mr J Rafferty's claim against Saica Pack UK Limited under rule 38 of the Employment Tribunal Procedure Rules 2024. The stated ground was that the claim had not been actively pursued within rule 38(1)(d).
The reasons note that on 25 April 2025 the Tribunal gave the claimant an opportunity to provide written reasons by 9 May 2025, or to request a hearing to consider why the claim should not be struck out. The claimant did neither, and the Tribunal therefore struck out the claim. No substantive liability findings or monetary remedy were recorded.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The extracted judgment does not identify the underlying substantive claim type(s); it records only that the claim was struck out for not being actively pursued under rule 38(1)(d). | Struck out | — | — |
Legal tests applied
2 references- rule 38 of the Employment Tribunal Procedure Rules 2024
- rule 38(1)(d)
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.