Case 4101287/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Mr Andrew McCaig Mr Saqib Munir Fromajio Ltd Fireaway Pizza Ltd v N o Appearance o r Representation and 1 other — 2023
- Case reference
- 4101287/2023
- Decision date
- 28 June 2023
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge R Mackay
Parties
3 namedClaimant
Mr Andrew McCaig Mr Saqib Munir Fromajio Ltd Fireaway Pizza Ltd
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe hearing took place in Glasgow on 26 June 2023 before Employment Judge R Mackay, with the claimant appearing in person and no appearance or representation for any of the respondents. The tribunal found that the claimant was employed by the first respondent, Mr Saqib Munir.
The claimant’s claim for arrears of pay succeeded, and the first respondent was ordered to pay £353 gross. The claim for failure to provide a written statement of employment particulars also succeeded, with an award of £1,235 in respect of that failure.
The claimant’s claim of harassment on the grounds of race succeeded, and the first respondent was ordered to pay £2,500 for injury to feelings. The claims against the second and third respondents were dismissed. Oral reasons were given at the end of the hearing.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Claim for arrears of pay succeeded; the first respondent was ordered to pay £353 gross. | Upheld | — | £353 |
| Other | Claim for failure to provide a written statement of employment particulars succeeded; the first respondent was ordered to pay £1,235. | Upheld | — | £1,235 |
| Harassment | Claim of harassment on the grounds of race succeeded; the first respondent was ordered to pay £2,500 for injury to feelings. | Upheld | Race | £2,500 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £4,088
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.