Case 4101374/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Case Number: 4101374/2019 Miss L Reyce v Glasgow City Council Glasgow Life — 2025
- Case reference
- 4101374/2019
- Decision date
- 24 March 2025
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge Frances Eccles
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Case Number: 4101374/2019 Miss L Reyce
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe judgment records that the claim was struck out under rule 38 of the Employment Tribunal Procedure Rules 2024 because it had not been actively pursued, specifically under rule 38(1)(d). The decision is procedural only and does not contain any findings on the merits of the underlying claim.
The tribunal noted that on 24 February 2025 it had given the claimant an opportunity to provide written reasons by 10 March 2025, or to request a hearing to explain why the claim should not be struck out. The claimant did not give an acceptable reason and did not request a hearing.
On that basis, the tribunal struck out the claim. No remedy, liability finding, or substantive award is recorded in the judgment text provided.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The extracted judgment does not identify the substantive claim type; it only records that the claim was struck out under rule 38(1)(d) for not being actively pursued. | Struck out | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- rule 38(1)(d) of the Employment Tribunal Procedure Rules 2024
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.