Case 4101659/2023 · Employment Tribunal
B Walters v Todos Media Ltd and 4 others — 2023
- Case reference
- 4101659/2023
- Decision date
- 29 June 2023
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge P McMahon
- Venue
- Glasgow
Parties
6 namedClaimant
B Walters
Respondents
- Todos Media Ltd
- ’s December 2022 salary of the gross sum of £6,199.99 (SIX THOUSAND, ONE HUNDRED AND NINETY NINE POUNDS AND NINETY NINE PENCE) contrary to section 13(1) of the Employment Rights Act 1996 (the “ERA”). (ii) The
- In the months of October, November and December 2022 in the gross sum of £775.02 (SEVEN HUNDRED AND SEVENTY FIVE POUNDS AND TWO PENCE) contrary to section 13(1) of the ERA. 4101659/2023 Page (iii) The
- The gross sum of £4,975.01 (FOUR THOUSAND, NINE HUNDRED AND SEVENTY FIVE POUNDS AND ONE PENCE) (being £6,199.99 + £755.02 - £2,000) in accordance with section 24(1) and section (3) of the ERA.5 (iv) The
- , provided that if it does so, the
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claimant brought a single unlawful deduction from wages claim covering three heads: unpaid December 2022 salary, employee pension contributions deducted in October to December 2022 and not paid into NEST, and employer pension contributions for the same period. The respondent filed no response and did not appear at the hearing. The tribunal heard evidence from the claimant, accepted him as honest and reliable, and relied on his oral evidence together with the contract, December 2022 payslip, NEST contribution history and NEST correspondence.
On the salary head, the tribunal found that the claimant's employment ended on 28 December 2022 and that his December salary was due by the end of that month but was not paid. It held that the non-payment was an unlawful deduction under section 13 ERA 1996. The tribunal calculated the unlawful deduction at £6,199.99 gross, being the claimant's December salary of £6,458.33 less £258.34 that would have been deducted for employee pension contributions. It then applied section 25(3) ERA 1996 because the respondent had already paid the claimant £2,000 around the beginning of March 2023.
On the employee pension contribution head, the tribunal found that £258.34 per month should have been paid into NEST for October, November and December 2022 but was not. It held that the respondent's failure to pay those sums into the pension scheme was still an unlawful deduction, referring to Gibson v Lothian Leisure. That head was therefore upheld in the gross sum of £775.02.
The employer pension contribution head failed. Although the tribunal found that the respondent had not paid £193.75 per month into NEST for October, November and December 2022, it held that employer pension contributions are not 'wages' within section 27(1) ERA 1996 and therefore cannot found an unlawful deduction from wages claim. Citing Somerset County Council v Chambers, the tribunal dismissed that head. The tribunal's final order required the respondent to pay £4,975.01 gross, subject to tax and employee national insurance deductions if required by law.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recordedThis case has mixed outcomes under at least one legal claim type. A tribunal can uphold some allegations and dismiss others under the same legal head, so rows below may represent separate issues or allegation groups from the judgment.
| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal found that the respondent did not pay the claimant's December 2022 salary when it fell due at the end of December 2022. It treated the non-payment as an unlawful deduction under section 13 ERA 1996 and, under section 25(3), reduced the amount payable by £2,000 already paid around the beginning of March 2023. The written reasons contain a typographical inconsistency in the arithmetic line, but the operative order is for £4,975.01 gross in total. | Upheld | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal found that £258.34 per month was deductible from the claimant's gross salary in respect of employee pension contributions for October, November and December 2022, but that the respondent did not pay those sums into the NEST scheme. It held this was a series of unlawful deductions within section 13 ERA 1996, referring to Gibson v Lothian Leisure. | Upheld | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal accepted that the respondent did not pay £193.75 per month into NEST as employer pension contributions for October, November and December 2022, but held that employer pension contributions are not 'wages' for the purposes of section 13 ERA 1996. It relied on Somerset County Council v Chambers for that proposition. | Dismissed | — | — |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £4,975
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
11 references- balance of probabilities
- section 13(1) ERA 1996
- section 13(3) ERA 1996
- Delaney v Staples
- Gibson v Lothian Leisure
- section 27(1) ERA 1996
- Somerset County Council v Chambers
- section 24(1) ERA 1996
- section 25(3) ERA 1996
- Robertson v Blackstone Franks Investment Management Ltd
- Autonomy Systems Ltd v Cuddington
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.